

MAIZE
Tall annual cereal grass bearing kernels
on large ears: widely cultivated in America in many varieties; the
principal cereal in Mexico and Central and South America since
pre-Columbian times.
Varieties of Maize
- Dent corn
- Flint corn
- Popcorn
- Flour corn
- Sweet corn
- Pod corn
India in World Maize Industry
| Country |
Metric
Ton |
| 1995 |
2000 |
2003 |
| Argentina |
11,404,041 |
16,781,400 |
15,040,000 |
| Brazil |
36,266,952 |
31,879,392 |
47,809,300 |
| China |
112,361,571 |
106,178,315 |
114,175,000 |
| France |
12,739,600 |
16,018,353 |
11,898,000 |
| India |
9,534,000 |
12,043,200 |
14,800,000 |
| Indonesia |
8,245,902 |
9,677,000 |
10,910,104 |
| Italy |
8,454,200 |
10,137,500 |
8,978,180 |
| Nigeria |
6,931,000 |
4,107,000 |
5,150,000 |
| Romania |
9,923,132 |
4,898,000 |
9,576,985 |
| South Africa |
4,866,000 |
11,431,183 |
9,714,254 |
| Ukraine |
3,391,800 |
3,848,100 |
6,900,000 |
| United States of America |
187,968,992 |
251,854,000 |
256,904,560 |
ALL-INDIA AREA, PRODUCTION AND YIELD OF MAIZE
| YEAR |
AREA
(M.HECTS) |
PRODUCTION
(M.TONNES) |
YIELD
(KGS/HECT) |
% COVERAGE
UNDER IRRIGATION |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 1949-50 |
3.26 |
2.05 |
627 |
12.8 |
| 1950-51 |
3.16 |
1.73 |
547 |
11.4 |
| 1951-52 |
3.31 |
2.08 |
627 |
16.4 |
| 1952-53 |
3.61 |
2.87 |
796 |
14 |
| 1953-54 |
3.87 |
3.04 |
785 |
11.5 |
| 1954-55 |
3.75 |
2.98 |
794 |
14.6 |
| 1955-56 |
3.7 |
2.6 |
704 |
11.8 |
| 1956-57 |
3.76 |
3.08 |
819 |
13.1 |
| 1957-58 |
4.08 |
3.15 |
772 |
13.4 |
| 1958-59 |
4.27 |
3.46 |
812 |
10.5 |
| 1959-60 |
4.34 |
4.07 |
938 |
9.9 |
| 1960-61 |
4.41 |
4.08 |
926 |
12.6 |
| 1961-62 |
4.51 |
4.31 |
957 |
9.5 |
| 1962-63 |
4.64 |
4.61 |
992 |
11.5 |
| 1963-64 |
4.58 |
4.56 |
995 |
11.4 |
| 1964-65 |
4.62 |
4.66 |
1010 |
12.1 |
| 1965-66 |
4.8 |
4.82 |
1005 |
16.1 |
| 1966-67 |
5.07 |
4.89 |
964 |
15.6 |
| 1967-68 |
5.58 |
6.27 |
1123 |
11.9 |
| 1968-69 |
5.72 |
5.7 |
997 |
19.5 |
| 1969-70 |
5.86 |
5.67 |
968 |
18.2 |
| 1970-71 |
5.85 |
7.49 |
1279 |
15.9 |
| 1971-72 |
5.67 |
5.1 |
900 |
14.3 |
| 1972-73 |
5.84 |
6.39 |
1094 |
18.8 |
| 1973-74 |
6.02 |
5.8 |
965 |
14.7 |
| 1974-75 |
5.86 |
5.56 |
948 |
21 |
| 1975-76 |
6.03 |
7.26 |
1203 |
16.2 |
| 1976-77 |
6 |
6.36 |
1060 |
17.7 |
| 1977-78 |
5.68 |
5.97 |
1051 |
16.3 |
| 1978-79 |
5.76 |
6.2 |
1076 |
16.3 |
| 1979-80 |
5.72 |
5.6 |
979 |
24 |
| 1980-81 |
6.01 |
6.96 |
1159 |
20.1 |
| 1981-82 |
5.94 |
6.9 |
1162 |
19.8 |
| 1982-83 |
5.72 |
6.55 |
1145 |
21.7 |
| 1983-84 |
5.86 |
7.92 |
1352 |
16.9 |
| 1984-85 |
5.8 |
8.44 |
1456 |
17.5 |
| 1985-86 |
5.8 |
6.64 |
1146 |
18.7 |
| 1986-87 |
5.92 |
7.59 |
1282 |
21.2 |
| 1987-88 |
5.56 |
5.72 |
1029 |
21.2 |
| 1988-89 |
5.9 |
8.23 |
1395 |
21 |
| 1989-90 |
5.92 |
9.65 |
1632 |
20.8 |
| 1990-91 |
5.9 |
8.96 |
1518 |
19.7 |
| 1991-92 |
5.86 |
8.06 |
1376 |
22.5 |
| 1992-93 |
5.96 |
9.99 |
1676 |
21.6 |
| 1993-94 |
6 |
9.6 |
1602 |
22.6 |
| 1994-95 |
6.14 |
8.88 |
1570 |
20.5 |
| 1995-96 |
5.98 |
9.53 |
1595 |
22.7 |
| 1996-97 |
6.26 |
10.77 |
1720 |
|
| 1997-98 |
6.31 |
10.85 |
1721 |
|
STATE-WISE AREA, PRODUCTION AND YIELD OF MAIZE
| 1997-98 |
| STATE |
AREA
(M. HECTS) |
% OF TOTAL
AREA |
PRODUCTION
(M.TONNES) |
% OF TOTAL
PRODUCTION |
YIELD
(KGS/HECT) |
%COVERAGE UNDER IRRIGATION
(1995-96) |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
12 |
| ANDHRA PRADESH |
0.4 |
6.3 |
1.08 |
10 |
2737 |
34.2 |
| BIHAR |
0.69 |
10.9 |
1.17 |
10.8 |
1703 |
40 |
| GUJARAT |
0.4 |
6.3 |
0.66 |
6.1 |
1646 |
9.6 |
| HIMACHAL PRADESH |
0.31 |
4.9 |
0.62 |
5.7 |
1990 |
7.5 |
| JAMMU & KASHMIR |
0.31 |
4.9 |
0.44 |
4.1 |
1418 |
5.9 |
| KARNATAKA |
0.56 |
8.9 |
1.67 |
15.4 |
2984 |
65.2 |
| MADHYA PRADESH |
0.83 |
13.2 |
1.1 |
10.1 |
1318 |
1.3 |
Factors that Affects Maize Prices
- Role of weather in crop production is immense. Temperature,
rainfall and soil moisture are the important parameters that
determine the crop condition. Further, natural calamities like
typhoon, floods, droughts and earthquake can also affect crops.
Markets keep watch of these developments.
- Changes in the minimum support prices (MSP) by the government
also have immense impact on the prices of the commodity.
- Availability of substitute products at cheaper rate may lead to
weakness in demand. This situation happens especially when the main
products price tends to become higher. For e.g., jowar/ bajra may be
preferred by poultry feed manufacturers instead of maize, if its
prices are high
- Breakthrough in the technology may increase the productivity and
would lead to more supply. This may bring some softness in the
price.

|